7.0 KiB
Feature Specification: Remove Command with Sequential Multi-Pattern Support
Feature Branch: 003-add-remove-command
Created: 2025-10-29
Status: Draft
Input: User description: "添加 移除(Remove)命令,用于删除指定字符、字符串,支持同时删除多个字符串,示例:renamer remove str1 str2 ....,注意:多个移除时后续参数的移除依赖于前一个移除后的结果,移除计算完成前不进行重命名,避免IO负载过高"
User Scenarios & Testing (mandatory)
User Story 1 - Remove Unwanted Tokens in One Pass (Priority: P1)
As a CLI user tidying filenames, I want renamer remove to delete multiple substrings in order so I
can normalize file names without writing custom scripts.
Why this priority: Delivers the core value—batch cleanup of recurring tokens across many files with predictable results.
Independent Test: Run renamer remove " copy" " draft" --dry-run in a sample directory,
confirm preview shows the ordered removal effects, then apply with --yes and verify names update
accordingly.
Acceptance Scenarios:
- Given files
report copy draft.txtandnotes draft.txt, When the user runsrenamer remove " copy" " draft", Then the preview shows both tokens removed sequentially and execution producesreport.txtandnotes.txt. - Given patterns where later removals depend on earlier results (e.g., removing
foothenfoo-), When the command runs, Then each removal applies to the output of the previous step before computing rename conflicts.
User Story 2 - Script-Friendly Removal Workflow (Priority: P2)
As an operator automating rename tasks, I want deterministic previews, exit codes, and ledger entries
so scripts can run renamer remove safely without interactive prompts.
Why this priority: Ensures automation pipelines can rely on the same safety guarantees as manual runs.
Independent Test: In a CI script, call renamer remove ... --dry-run, assert exit code 0, then
run with --yes and verify ledger entry plus renamer undo restores originals.
Acceptance Scenarios:
- Given a non-interactive context, When the user passes
--yesafter a successful preview, Then the command exits 0 on success and writes a ledger entry capturing tokens removed per file. - Given invalid input (e.g., fewer than two arguments), When the command executes, Then it exits with non-zero status and instructs the user on correct sequential argument usage.
User Story 3 - Validate Sequential Removal Inputs (Priority: P3)
As a power user managing complex token lists, I want clear validation and guidance for spaces, duplicate tokens, and results that could produce empty filenames so I can adjust before applying.
Why this priority: Prevents surprise failures when tokens overlap or yield empty names.
Independent Test: Run renamer remove "Project X" " Project" "X" --dry-run, confirm preview
shows the sequential impact and warns if names collapse; invalid quoting should produce actionable
errors.
Acceptance Scenarios:
- Given duplicate tokens, When the command runs, Then duplicates are deduplicated with a warning and order preserved for remaining unique tokens.
- Given a removal sequence that would produce an empty basename, When the preview runs, Then the command warns and excludes the rename unless the user overrides in a future version.
Edge Cases
- Sequential removals should operate on the output of prior removals within the same filename.
- Removing tokens may collapse names to empty strings or leave trailing separators; preview must flag these cases before apply.
- Resulting names may collide; conflicts must be reported before confirmation.
- Hidden files or directories may need inclusion depending on scope flags (
--hidden). - No matches should result in a friendly "No entries matched" message and exit code 0 without ledger writes.
Requirements (mandatory)
Functional Requirements
- FR-001: The CLI MUST expose
renamer remove <pattern1> [pattern2 ...]where all tokens are literal substrings removed sequentially; final name computation MUST complete before any renames occur. - FR-002: Preview → confirm workflow MUST mirror existing commands, listing original and proposed names with highlighted removals.
- FR-003: Executions MUST append detailed entries to
.renamerincluding original names, tokens removed (with order), resulting names, and timestamps so undo remains possible. - FR-004: Users MUST be able to undo the most recent remove batch via existing undo mechanics without leaving orphaned files.
- FR-005: Command MUST respect global scope flags (
--path,--recursive,--include-dirs,--hidden,--extensions,--dry-run,--yes) identical tolist/replacebehavior. - FR-006: Preview MUST evaluate all removals first, calculate conflicts, and only then apply filesystem operations when confirmed, limiting IO load.
- FR-007: Command MUST warn (and skip) renames that would result in empty basenames unless a future explicit override flag is provided.
- FR-008: Invalid invocations (fewer than two arguments, empty tokens after trimming) MUST fail with exit code ≠0 and actionable usage guidance.
- FR-009: Help output MUST document sequential behavior, whitespace quoting, and interaction with other scope flags.
Key Entities
- RemoveRequest: Captures working directory, scope flags, ordered token list, and preview/apply options.
- RemoveSummary: Aggregates per-token match counts, per-file outcomes, conflicts, and warnings for preview and ledger output.
Success Criteria (mandatory)
Measurable Outcomes
- SC-001: Users complete a sequential removal across 100 files (preview + apply) in under 2 minutes end-to-end.
- SC-002: 95% of usability test participants correctly understand that removals execute in the
provided order after reading
renamer remove --help. - SC-003: Automated regression tests confirm remove + undo leave the filesystem unchanged in 100% of scripted scenarios.
- SC-004: Support requests related to manual substring cleanup drop by 35% within the first release cycle after launch.
Assumptions
- Removals are literal substring matches; regex or wildcard support is out of scope for this release.
- Default matching is case-sensitive; case-insensitive options can be considered later if needed.
- Delete operations target filenames (and directories when
-d/--include-dirsis set), not file contents. - Existing traversal, conflict detection, and ledger infrastructure can be extended for the remove command.
Dependencies & Risks
- Requires new remove-specific packages analogous to replace to maintain modularity.
- Help/quickstart documentation must be updated to explain sequential removal behavior.
- Potential filename conflicts or empty results must be detected pre-apply to avoid data loss.