4.6 KiB
Feature Specification: [FEATURE NAME]
Feature Branch: [###-feature-name]
Created: [DATE]
Status: Draft
Input: User description: "$ARGUMENTS"
User Scenarios & Testing (mandatory)
User Story 1 - [Brief Title] (Priority: P1)
[Describe this user journey in plain language]
Why this priority: [Explain the value and why it has this priority level]
Independent Test: [Describe how this can be tested independently - e.g., "Can be fully tested by [specific action] and delivers [specific value]"]
Acceptance Scenarios:
- Given [initial state], When [action], Then [expected outcome]
- Given [initial state], When [action], Then [expected outcome]
User Story 2 - [Brief Title] (Priority: P2)
[Describe this user journey in plain language]
Why this priority: [Explain the value and why it has this priority level]
Independent Test: [Describe how this can be tested independently]
Acceptance Scenarios:
- Given [initial state], When [action], Then [expected outcome]
User Story 3 - [Brief Title] (Priority: P3)
[Describe this user journey in plain language]
Why this priority: [Explain the value and why it has this priority level]
Independent Test: [Describe how this can be tested independently]
Acceptance Scenarios:
- Given [initial state], When [action], Then [expected outcome]
[Add more user stories as needed, each with an assigned priority]
Edge Cases
- How does the rename plan handle conflicting target names or read-only files?
- What is the expected behavior when the
.renamerledger is missing, corrupted, or out of sync? - How are case-only renames or Unicode normalization differences managed across platforms?
- What feedback is provided when an extension filter yields zero matches or contains invalid tokens?
Requirements (mandatory)
Functional Requirements
- FR-001: CLI MUST generate a deterministic preview of all pending renames before execution.
- FR-002: Users MUST confirm the preview (or abort) prior to any filesystem changes.
- FR-003: The tool MUST append every confirmed batch to the
.renamerledger with sufficient metadata for undo. - FR-004: Users MUST be able to undo the most recent batch safely, even across process restarts.
- FR-005: CLI MUST support directory targeting (
-d) and optional recursive traversal (-r) with clear scope boundaries. - FR-006: CLI MUST accept an extension filter flag (
-e) that parses.-prefixed,|-delimited extensions and applies the filter consistently across preview, execute, and undo flows.
Example of marking unclear requirements:
- FR-007: CLI MUST support additional rename rule
[RULE_NAME][NEEDS CLARIFICATION: inputs/outputs not defined] - FR-008: CLI MUST expose automation-friendly output [NEEDS CLARIFICATION: format (JSON, plain text) undecided]
Key Entities (include if feature involves data)
- RenameBatch: Represents a single preview/execute cycle; attributes include rules applied, timestamp, working directory, and file mappings.
- RuleDefinition: Captures configuration for a rename rule (inputs, validations, dependencies) without binding to implementation.
Success Criteria (mandatory)
Measurable Outcomes
- SC-001: [Measurable metric, e.g., "Users can complete account creation in under 2 minutes"]
- SC-002: [Measurable metric, e.g., "System handles 1000 concurrent users without degradation"]
- SC-003: [User satisfaction metric, e.g., "90% of users successfully complete primary task on first attempt"]
- SC-004: [Business metric, e.g., "Reduce support tickets related to [X] by 50%"]