diff --git a/skills/subagent-driven-development/SKILL.md b/skills/subagent-driven-development/SKILL.md index 1945714a..d35714d6 100644 --- a/skills/subagent-driven-development/SKILL.md +++ b/skills/subagent-driven-development/SKILL.md @@ -181,6 +181,11 @@ final whole-branch review. When you fill a reviewer template: findings in the progress ledger as you go, and point the final whole-branch review at that list so it can triage which must be fixed before merge. A roll-up nobody reads is a silent discard. +- A finding labeled plan-mandated — or any finding that conflicts with + what the plan's text requires — is the human's decision, like any plan + contradiction: present the finding and the plan text, ask which governs. + Do not dismiss the finding because the plan mandates it, and do not + dispatch a fix that contradicts the plan without asking. - The final whole-branch review gets a package too: run `scripts/review-package MERGE_BASE HEAD` (MERGE_BASE = the commit the branch started from, e.g. `git merge-base main HEAD`) and include the diff --git a/skills/subagent-driven-development/task-reviewer-prompt.md b/skills/subagent-driven-development/task-reviewer-prompt.md index 6f930e27..588a4022 100644 --- a/skills/subagent-driven-development/task-reviewer-prompt.md +++ b/skills/subagent-driven-development/task-reviewer-prompt.md @@ -128,6 +128,11 @@ Subagent (general-purpose): would block a merge over — verbatim duplication of a logic block, swallowed errors, tests that assert nothing. "Coverage could be broader" and polish suggestions are Minor. + If the plan or brief explicitly mandates something this rubric calls a + defect (a test that asserts nothing, verbatim duplication of a logic + block), that IS a finding — report it as Important, labeled + plan-mandated. The plan's authorship does not grade its own work; the + human decides. Acknowledge what was done well before listing issues — accurate praise helps the implementer trust the rest of the feedback.