From c7675f7339444e5afc1ccf63d7353e03a53e93be Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jesse Vincent Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2026 12:29:40 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] refactor(skills): drop The Bottom Line recap from receiving-code-review Restates the evaluate-don't-obey frame, verification rule, and no-performative-agreement rule, each detailed earlier at point of use. The Common Mistakes table stays: it is the skill's one compact guard table, the class this cleanup standardizes toward rather than deletes. --- skills/receiving-code-review/SKILL.md | 8 -------- 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/skills/receiving-code-review/SKILL.md b/skills/receiving-code-review/SKILL.md index 4c77a10e..950da7b7 100644 --- a/skills/receiving-code-review/SKILL.md +++ b/skills/receiving-code-review/SKILL.md @@ -203,11 +203,3 @@ You understand 1,2,3,6. Unclear on 4,5. ## GitHub Thread Replies When replying to inline review comments on GitHub, reply in the comment thread (`gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{pr}/comments/{id}/replies`), not as a top-level PR comment. - -## The Bottom Line - -**External feedback = suggestions to evaluate, not orders to follow.** - -Verify. Question. Then implement. - -No performative agreement. Technical rigor always.