rogee/superpowers
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/obra/superpowers.git synced 2026-05-07 09:39:05 +08:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
440 Commits 63 Branches 27 Tags
f2cbfbefebbfef77321e4c9abc9e949826bea9d7
Commit Graph

19 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Jesse Vincent
f2cbfbefeb Release v5.1.0 (#1468) 
* docs: add Codex App compatibility design spec (PRI-823)

Design for making using-git-worktrees, finishing-a-development-branch,
and subagent-driven-development skills work in the Codex App's sandboxed
worktree environment. Read-only environment detection via git-dir vs
git-common-dir comparison, ~48 lines across 4 files, zero breaking changes.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: address spec review feedback for PRI-823

Fix three Important issues from spec review:
- Clarify Step 1.5 placement relative to existing Steps 2/3
- Re-derive environment state at cleanup time instead of relying on
  earlier skill output
- Acknowledge pre-existing Step 5 cleanup inconsistency

Also: precise step references, exact codex-tools.md content, clearer
Integration section update instructions.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: address team review feedback for PRI-823 spec

- Add commit SHA + data loss warning to handoff payload (HIGH)
- Add explicit commit step before handoff (HIGH)
- Remove misleading "mark as externally managed" from Path B
- Add executing-plans 1-line edit (was missing)
- Add branch name derivation rules
- Add conditional UI language for non-App environments
- Add sandbox fallback for permission errors
- Add STOP directive after Step 0 reporting

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: clarify executing-plans in What Does NOT Change section

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: add cleanup guard test (#5) and sandbox fallback test (#10) to spec

Both tests address real risk scenarios:
- #5: cleanup guard bug would delete Codex App's own worktree (data loss)
- #10: Local thread sandbox fallback needs manual Codex App validation

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: add implementation plan for Codex App compatibility (PRI-823)

8 tasks covering: environment detection in using-git-worktrees,
Step 1.5 + cleanup guard in finishing-a-development-branch,
Integration line updates, codex-tools.md docs, automated tests,
and final verification.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs(codex-tools): add named agent dispatch mapping for Codex (#647)

* fix(writing-skills): correct false 'only two fields' frontmatter claim (#882)

* Replace subagent review loops with lightweight inline self-review

The subagent review loop (dispatching a fresh agent to review plans/specs)
doubled execution time (~25 min overhead) without measurably improving plan
quality. Regression testing across 5 versions (v3.6.0 through v5.0.4) with
5 trials each showed identical plan sizes, task counts, and quality scores
regardless of whether the review loop ran.

Changes:
- writing-plans: Replace subagent Plan Review Loop with inline Self-Review
  checklist (spec coverage, placeholder scan, type consistency)
- writing-plans: Add explicit "No Placeholders" section listing plan failures
  (TBD, vague descriptions, undefined references, "similar to Task N")
- brainstorming: Replace subagent Spec Review Loop with inline Spec Self-Review
  (placeholder scan, internal consistency, scope check, ambiguity check)
- Both skills now use "look at it with fresh eyes" framing

Testing: 5 trials with the new skill show self-review catches 3-5 real bugs
per run (spawn positions, API mismatches, seed bugs, grid indexing) in ~30s
instead of ~25 min. Remaining defects are comparable to the subagent approach.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* Revert "Replace subagent review loops with lightweight inline self-review"

This reverts commit bf8f7572eb.

* Reapply "Replace subagent review loops with lightweight inline self-review"

This reverts commit b045fa3950.

* Add v5.0.6 release notes

* Move brainstorm server metadata to .meta/ subdirectory

Metadata files (.server-info, .events, .server.pid, .server.log,
.server-stopped) were stored in the same directory served over HTTP,
making them accessible via the /files/ route. They now live in a .meta/
subdirectory that is not web-accessible.

Also fixes a stale test assertion ("Waiting for Claude" → "Waiting for
the agent").

Reported-By: 吉田仁

* Revert "Move brainstorm server metadata to .meta/ subdirectory"

This reverts commit ab500dade6.

* Separate brainstorm server content and state into peer directories

The session directory now contains two peers: content/ (HTML served to
the browser) and state/ (events, server-info, pid, log). Previously
all files shared a single directory, making server state and user
interaction data accessible over the /files/ HTTP route.

Also fixes stale test assertion ("Waiting for Claude" → "Waiting for
the agent").

Reported-By: 吉田仁

* Fix owner-PID false positive when owner runs as different user

ownerAlive() treated EPERM (permission denied) the same as ESRCH
(process not found), causing the server to self-terminate within 60s
whenever the owner process ran as a different user. This affected WSL
(owner is a Windows process), Tailscale SSH, and any cross-user
scenario.

The fix: `return e.code === 'EPERM'` — if we get permission denied,
the process is alive; we just can't signal it.

Tested on Linux via Tailscale SSH with a root-owned grandparent PID:
- Server survives past the 60s lifecycle check (EPERM = alive)
- Server still shuts down when owner genuinely dies (ESRCH = dead)

Fixes #879

* Fix owner-PID lifecycle monitoring for cross-platform reliability

Two bugs caused the brainstorm server to self-terminate within 60s:

1. ownerAlive() treated EPERM (permission denied) as "process dead".
   When the owner PID belongs to a different user (Tailscale SSH,
   system daemons), process.kill(pid, 0) throws EPERM — but the
   process IS alive. Fixed: return e.code === 'EPERM'.

2. On WSL, the grandparent PID resolves to a short-lived subprocess
   that exits before the first 60s lifecycle check. The PID is
   genuinely dead (ESRCH), so the EPERM fix alone doesn't help.
   Fixed: validate the owner PID at server startup — if it's already
   dead, it was a bad resolution, so disable monitoring and rely on
   the 30-minute idle timeout.

This also removes the Windows/MSYS2-specific OWNER_PID="" carve-out
from start-server.sh, since the server now handles invalid PIDs
generically at startup regardless of platform.

Tested on Linux (magic-kingdom) via Tailscale SSH:
- Root-owned owner PID (EPERM): server survives ✓
- Dead owner PID at startup (WSL sim): monitoring disabled, survives ✓
- Valid owner that dies: server shuts down within 60s ✓

Fixes #879

* Release v5.0.6: inline self-review, brainstorm server restructure, owner-PID fixes

* fix: add Copilot CLI platform detection for sessionStart context injection

Copilot CLI v1.0.11 reads `additionalContext` from sessionStart hook
output, but the session-start script only emits the Claude Code-specific
nested format. Add COPILOT_CLI env var detection so Copilot CLI gets the
SDK-standard top-level `additionalContext` while Claude Code continues
getting `hookSpecificOutput`.

Based on PR #910 by @culinablaz.

* feat: add Copilot CLI tool mapping, docs, and install instructions

- Add references/copilot-tools.md with full tool equivalence table
- Add Copilot CLI to using-superpowers skill platform instructions
- Add marketplace install instructions to README
- Add changelog entry crediting @culinablaz for the hook fix

* fix(opencode): align skills path across bootstrap, runtime, and tests

The bootstrap text advertised a configDir-based skills path that didn't
match the runtime path (resolved relative to the plugin file). Tests
used yet another hardcoded path and referenced a nonexistent lib/ dir.

- Remove misleading skills path from bootstrap text; the agent should
  use the native skill tool, not read files by path
- Fix test setup to create a consistent layout matching the plugin's
  ../../skills resolution
- Export SUPERPOWERS_SKILLS_DIR from setup.sh so tests use a single
  source of truth
- Add regression test that bootstrap doesn't advertise the old path
- Remove broken cp of nonexistent lib/ directory

Fixes #847

* docs: add OpenCode path fix to release notes

* fix(opencode): inject bootstrap as user message instead of system message

Move bootstrap injection from experimental.chat.system.transform to
experimental.chat.messages.transform, prepending to the first user
message instead of adding a system message.

This avoids two issues:
- System messages repeated every turn inflate token usage (#750)
- Multiple system messages break Qwen and other models (#894)

Tested on OpenCode 1.3.2 with Claude Sonnet 4.5 — brainstorming skill
fires correctly on "Let's make a React to do list" prompt.

* docs: update release notes with OpenCode bootstrap change

* docs: add worktree rototill design spec (PRI-974)

Design for detect-and-defer worktree support. Superpowers defers to
native harness worktree systems when available, falls back to manual
git worktree creation when not. Covers Phases 0-2: detection, consent,
native tool preference, finishing state detection, and three bug fixes
(#940, #999, #238).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: address SWE review feedback on worktree rototill spec

- Fix Bug #999 order: merge → verify → remove worktree → delete branch
  (avoids losing work if merge fails after worktree removal)
- Add submodule guard to Step 0 detection (GIT_DIR != GIT_COMMON is also
  true in submodules)
- Preserve global path (~/.config/superpowers/worktrees/) in detection for
  backward compatibility, just stop offering it to new users
- Add step numbering note and implementation notes section
- Expand provenance heuristic to cover global path and manual creation

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: honest spec revisions after issue/PR deep dive

- Step 1a is the load-bearing assumption, not just a risk — if it fails,
  the entire design needs rework. TDD validation must be first impl task.
- #1009 resolution depends on Step 1a working, stated explicitly
- #574 honestly deferred, not "partially addressed"
- Add hooks symlink to Step 1b (PR #965 idea, prevents silent hook loss)
- Add stale worktree pruning to Step 5 (PR #1072 idea, one-line self-heal)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: add worktree rototill implementation plan (PRI-974)

5 tasks: TDD gate for Step 1a, using-git-worktrees rewrite,
finishing-a-development-branch rewrite, integration updates,
end-to-end validation. Task 1 is a hard gate — if native tool
preference fails RED/GREEN, stop and redesign.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* test: add RED/GREEN validation for native worktree preference (PRI-974)

Gate test for Step 1a — validates agents prefer EnterWorktree over
git worktree add on Claude Code. Must pass before skill rewrite.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* feat: rewrite using-git-worktrees with detect-and-defer (PRI-974)

Step 0: GIT_DIR != GIT_COMMON detection (skip if already isolated)
Step 0 consent: opt-in prompt before creating worktree (#991)
Step 1a: native tool preference (short, first, declarative)
Step 1b: git worktree fallback with hooks symlink and legacy path compat
Submodule guard prevents false detection
Platform-neutral instruction file references (#1049)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* feat: rewrite finishing-a-development-branch with detect-and-defer (PRI-974)

Step 2: environment detection (GIT_DIR != GIT_COMMON) before presenting menu
Detached HEAD: reduced 3-option menu (no merge from detached HEAD)
Provenance-based cleanup: .worktrees/ = ours, anything else = hands off
Bug #940: Option 2 no longer cleans up worktree
Bug #999: merge -> verify -> remove worktree -> delete branch
Bug #238: cd to main repo root before git worktree remove
Stale worktree pruning after removal (git worktree prune)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix: address spec review findings in both skill rewrites (PRI-974)

using-git-worktrees: submodule guard now says "treat as normal repo"
instead of "proceed to Step 1" (preserves consent flow)
using-git-worktrees: directory priority summaries include global legacy

finishing-a-development-branch: move git branch -d after Step 6 cleanup
to make Bug #999 ordering unambiguous (merge -> worktree remove -> branch delete)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix: update worktree integration references across skills (PRI-974)

Remove REQUIRED language from executing-plans and subagent-driven-development.
Consent and detection now live inside using-git-worktrees itself.
Fix stale 'created by brainstorming' claim in writing-plans.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix: include worktrees/ (non-hidden) in finishing provenance check (PRI-974)

The creation skill supports both .worktrees/ and worktrees/ directories,
but the finishing skill's cleanup only checked .worktrees/. Worktrees
under the non-hidden path would be orphaned on merge or discard.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix: Step 1a validated through TDD — explicit naming + consent bridge (PRI-974)

Step 1a failed at 2/6 with the spec's original abstract text ("use your
native tool"). Three REFACTOR iterations found what works (50/50 runs):

1. Explicit tool naming — "do you have EnterWorktree, WorktreeCreate..."
   transforms interpretation into factual toolkit check
2. Consent bridge — "user's consent is your authorization" directly
   addresses EnterWorktree's "ONLY when user explicitly asks" guardrail
3. Red Flag entry naming the specific anti-pattern

File split was tested but proven unnecessary — the fix is the Step 1a
text quality, not physical separation of git commands. Control test
with full 240-line skill (all git commands visible) passed 20/20.

Test script updated: supports batch runs (./test.sh green 20), "all"
phase, and checks absence of git worktree add (reliable signal) rather
than presence of EnterWorktree text (agent sometimes omits tool name).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: update spec with TDD findings on Step 1a (PRI-974)

Step 1a's original "deliberately short, abstract" design was disproven
by TDD (2/6 pass rate). Spec now documents the validated approach:
explicit tool naming + consent bridge + red flag (50/50 pass rate).

- Design Principles: updated to reflect explicit naming over abstraction
- Step 1a: replaced abstract text with validated approach, added design
  note explaining the TDD revision and why file splitting was unnecessary
- Risks: Step 1a risk marked RESOLVED with cross-platform validation table
  and residual risk note about upstream tool description dependency

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: honest cross-platform validation table in spec (PRI-974)

Research confirmed Claude Code is currently the only harness with an
agent-callable mid-session worktree tool. All others either create
worktrees before the agent starts (Codex App, Gemini, Cursor) or have
no native support (Codex CLI, OpenCode).

Table now shows: what was actually tested (Claude Code 50/50, Codex CLI
6/6), what was simulated (Codex App 1/1), and what's untested (Gemini,
Cursor, OpenCode). Step 1a is forward-compatible for when other
harnesses add agent-callable tools.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: cross-platform validation on 5 harnesses (PRI-974)

Tested on Gemini CLI (gemini -p) and Cursor Agent (cursor-agent -p):
- Gemini: Step 0 detection 1/1, Step 1b fallback 1/1
- Cursor: Step 0 detection 1/1, Step 1b fallback 1/1

Both correctly identified no native agent-callable worktree tool,
fell through to git worktree add, and performed safety verification.
Both correctly detected existing worktrees and skipped creation.

5 of 6 harnesses now tested. Only OpenCode untested (no CLI access).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix: remove incorrect hooks symlink step from worktree skill

Git worktrees inherit hooks from the main repo automatically via
$GIT_COMMON_DIR — this has been the case since git 2.5 (2015).
The symlink step was based on an incorrect premise from PR #965
and also fails in practice (.git is a file in worktrees, not a dir).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: address PR #1121 review — respect user preference, drop y/n

- Consent prompt: drop "(y/n)" and add escape valve for users who
  have already declared their worktree preference in global or
  project agent instruction files.
- Directory selection: reorder to put declared user preference
  ahead of observed filesystem state, and reframe the default as
  "if no other guidance available".
- Sandbox fallback: require explicitly informing the user that
  the sandbox blocked creation, not just "report accordingly".
- writing-plans: fully qualify the superpowers:using-git-worktrees
  reference.
- Plan doc: mirror the consent-prompt change.

Step 1a native-tool framing and the helper-scripts suggestion are
still outstanding — the first needs a benchmark re-run before softer
phrasing can be adopted without regressing compliance; the second is
exploratory and will get a thread reply.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: soften Step 1a native-tool framing per PR #1121 review

Address obra's comment on explicit step numbers / prescriptive tone.
Drops "STOP HERE if available", the "If YES:" gate, and the "even if /
even if / NO EXCEPTIONS" reinforcement paragraph. Keeps the specific
tool-name anchors (EnterWorktree, WorktreeCreate, /worktree, --worktree),
which the original TDD data showed are load-bearing.

A/B verified against drill harness on the 3 creation/consent scenarios
(consent-flow, creation-from-main, creation-from-main-spec-aware):
baseline explicit wording scored 12/12 criteria, softened wording also
scored 12/12. The "agent used the most appropriate tool" criterion
passed in all 3 softened runs — agents still picked EnterWorktree via
ToolSearch without the imperative framing.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: drop instruction file enumeration per PR #1121 review

Jesse flagged that the verbose CLAUDE.md/AGENTS.md/GEMINI.md/.cursorrules
enumeration (a) chews tokens, (b) confuses models that anchor on exact
strings, and (c) is repeated DRY-violatingly across 3+ locations.

Replace with abstract "your instructions" framing in four spots:
- skills/using-git-worktrees/SKILL.md Step 0 → Step 1 transition
- skills/using-git-worktrees/SKILL.md Step 1b Directory Selection
- docs/superpowers/plans/2026-04-06-worktree-rototill.md (both mirror locations)

Same intent, harness-agnostic phrasing, ~half the tokens.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix: replace hardcoded /Users/jesse with generic placeholders (#858)

* Remove the deprecated legacy slash commands (#1188)

* fix: prevent subagent-driven-development from pausing every 3 tasks

requesting-code-review had "review after each batch (3 tasks)" for
executing-plans, which leaked into subagent-driven-development as a
check-in cadence. Replaced with flexible "each task or at natural
checkpoints" and added explicit continuous execution directive to
subagent-driven-development.

* Remove Integration sections from skills

These sections don't help with steering and are a legacy of the time
before agents had native skills systems.

* fix(opencode): cache bootstrap content at module level to eliminate per-step file I/O

getBootstrapContent() called fs.existsSync + fs.readFileSync + regex
frontmatter parsing on every agent step with zero caching.  The
experimental.chat.messages.transform hook fires every step in opencode's
agent loop (messages are reloaded from DB each step via
filterCompactedEffect).  A 10-step turn triggered 10 redundant file
reads + 10 regex parses for content that never changes during a session.

Changes:
- Add module-level _bootstrapCache (undefined = not loaded, null = file
  missing) so the first call reads and parses SKILL.md, all subsequent
  calls return the cached string with zero filesystem access
- Cache the null sentinel when SKILL.md is missing, preventing repeated
  fs.existsSync probes
- Add _testing export (resetCache/getCache) for test infrastructure
- Clarify the injection guard comment explaining how it interacts with
  opencode's per-step message reloading
- Add 15 regression tests covering cache behavior, fs call counts,
  injection guard, missing file sentinel, cache reset, and source audit

Fixes #1202

* test(opencode): simplify bootstrap cache coverage

* docs: clarify opencode install caveats

* test(opencode): modernize integration tests

* docs: add Factory Droid installation instructions

* Preserve Codex marketplace metadata

* docs: add README quickstart install links (#1293)

* docs(codex-tools): fix subagent wait mapping to wait_agent

Update the Codex tool mapping so Claude Code 'Task returns result' maps to the current Codex spawned-agent result tool, wait_agent. Also clarify that older Codex builds exposed spawned-agent waiting as wait, while current bare wait is the code-mode exec/wait surface for yielded exec cells.

Verified with Drill:
- codex-tool-mapping-comprehension fails against dev with task_returns_result=wait
- codex-tool-mapping-comprehension passes against this PR with task_returns_result=wait_agent and exec/wait scoped correctly
- codex-subagent-wait-mapping passes against this PR with spawn_agent -> wait_agent -> close_agent and PR963_OK returned

* fix(cursor): run SessionStart hook via run-hook.cmd on Windows

Route Cursor's Windows SessionStart hook through the existing run-hook.cmd dispatcher instead of invoking the extensionless session-start script directly. This avoids Windows opening the extensionless hook file and lets Git Bash run the script as intended.

Also removed an accidental UTF-8 BOM from hooks-cursor.json before merging.

Verified:
- hooks-cursor.json parses as JSON and has no BOM
- command is ./hooks/run-hook.cmd session-start
- CURSOR_PLUGIN_ROOT=/tmp/superpowers ./hooks/run-hook.cmd session-start emits valid Cursor JSON with additional_context

* fix(tests): make SDD integration test actually run its assertions

The SDD integration test silently bailed before printing any verification
results. Three independent bugs caused this:

1. `WORKING_DIR_ESCAPED` was computed from `$SCRIPT_DIR/../..` without
   resolving `..` segments. The resulting "directory" name contained
   literal `..` so `find` was looking in a path that doesn't exist.

2. With `set -euo pipefail`, the `find ... | sort -r | head -1` pipeline
   could exit non-zero (SIGPIPE on the producer when head closes early),
   killing the script silently before assertions ran.

3. The `claude -p` invocation never passed `--plugin-dir`, so it loaded
   the installed plugin instead of the working tree. Local edits to
   skills under test were not actually being tested.

Other adjustments:
- Run claude from inside the unique TEST_PROJECT directory instead of
  from the plugin root, so its session JSONL lives in its own
  `~/.claude/projects/` folder and doesn't race other concurrent
  claude sessions for "most recent file".
- Use the same character-normalization claude does (every non-alphanumeric
  becomes `-`) when computing the session dir name; macOS-resolved
  `/private/var/...` paths and tmp dirs with `.`/`_` in their names need
  this to round-trip correctly.
- Accept either `"name":"Agent"` or `"name":"Task"` in the subagent count
  — the harness renamed the tool but the test wasn't updated.

Verified on this branch: all six verification tests now pass against a
real end-to-end SDD run (skill invoked, 7 subagents dispatched, 6
TodoWrite calls, working code produced, tests pass, no extra features).

* feat: add Gemini CLI subagent support mapping

Map Gemini Task dispatch to @agent-name/@generalist and document parallel subagent dispatch for independent tasks.

* docs: update Codex plugin install guidance (#1288)

* Lift superpowers:code-reviewer agent into the requesting-code-review skill

The plugin had a single named agent (`agents/code-reviewer.md`) used by
two skills, while every other reviewer/implementer subagent in the repo
is dispatched as `general-purpose` with the prompt template living
alongside its skill. That asymmetry had no upside and several costs:

- Two sources of truth for the code review checklist (the agent file
  and `requesting-code-review/code-reviewer.md`), both drifting
  independently.
- `Codex` users could not use the named agent directly; the codex-tools
  reference doc had a workaround section explaining how to flatten the
  named agent into a `worker` dispatch.
- No third-party reliance on `superpowers:code-reviewer` inside this
  repo.

Changes:
- Merge `agents/code-reviewer.md` (persona + checklist) and
  `skills/requesting-code-review/code-reviewer.md` (placeholder
  template) into a single self-contained Task-dispatch template,
  matching the shape of `implementer-prompt.md`,
  `spec-reviewer-prompt.md`, etc.
- Update `skills/requesting-code-review/SKILL.md` and
  `skills/subagent-driven-development/code-quality-reviewer-prompt.md`
  to dispatch `Task (general-purpose)` instead of the named agent.
- Drop the now-obsolete "Named agent dispatch" workaround sections from
  `codex-tools.md` and `copilot-tools.md` — superpowers no longer ships
  any named agents, so those instructions documented nothing.
- Delete `agents/code-reviewer.md` and the empty `agents/` directory.

Tier 3 coverage for the change: a new behavioral test
`tests/claude-code/test-requesting-code-review.sh` plants real bugs
(SQL injection, plaintext password handling, credential logging) into
a tiny project, runs the actual `requesting-code-review` skill against
the working tree, and asserts the dispatched reviewer flags every
planted issue at Critical/Important severity and refuses to approve
the diff.

Verified end-to-end on this branch:
- The new test passes (5/5 assertions; reviewer caught all planted
  bugs and several others).
- The existing SDD integration test still passes (7/7 subagents
  dispatched, all as `general-purpose`; spec compliance still
  rejects extra features; produced code is correct).
- Session JSONLs confirm zero remaining `superpowers:code-reviewer`
  dispatches anywhere in the SDD pipeline.

* Prepare v5.1.0: release notes and version bump

Add v5.1.0 release notes covering:
- Removals: legacy slash commands (/brainstorm, /execute-plan,
  /write-plan), skill Integration sections
- Worktree skills rewrite (PRI-974, PR #1121)
- Contributor guidelines for AI agents
- Codex plugin mirror tooling (PR #1165)
- OpenCode bootstrap caching (#1202)
- SDD pause-every-3-tasks fix; SDD integration test fixes
- Cursor Windows hook routing
- Gemini CLI subagent dispatch mapping
- Skill terminology cleanups
- Install docs (Factory Droid, Codex, quickstart links)

Bumps version 5.0.7 -> 5.1.0 across all declared files via
scripts/bump-version.sh; not yet tagged or released.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Drew Ritter <drewritter@workerbee.local>
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: Drew Ritter <drew@primeradiant.com>
Co-authored-by: Blaž Čulina <culina.blaz@nsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: Jesse Vincent <jesse@primeradiant.com>
Co-authored-by: voidborne-d <voidborne-d@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Richard Luo <luo.richard@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Drew Ritter <drew@ritter.dev>
Co-authored-by: leonsong09 <59187950+leonsong09@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: YuXiang Hong <41331696+starumiQAQ@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Sathvik Gilakamsetty <spacetime1007@gmail.com>
 2026-05-04 15:05:01 -07:00
Jesse Vincent
9ccce3bf07 Add context isolation principle to all delegation skills 
Subagents should never inherit the parent session's context or history.
The dispatcher constructs exactly what each subagent needs, keeping
both sides focused: the subagent on its task, the controller on
coordination.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
 2026-03-11 18:47:56 -07:00
Jesse Vincent
daa3fb2322 Add architecture guidance and capability-aware escalation to skills 
Add design-for-isolation and working-in-existing-codebases guidance to
brainstorming. Add file size awareness and escalation prompts to SDD
implementer and code quality reviewer. Writing-plans gets architecture
section sizing guidance. Spec and plan reviewers get architecture and
file size checks.
 2026-03-06 14:48:48 -08:00
Jesse Vincent
f57638a747 refactor: restructure specs and plans directories 
- Specs (brainstorming output) now go to docs/superpowers/specs/
- Plans (writing-plans output) now go to docs/superpowers/plans/
- User preferences for locations override these defaults
- Update all skill references and test files

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
 2026-03-06 13:01:31 -08:00
CL Kao
c7816ee2a6 docs: change main branch red flag to require explicit user consent 
Instead of prohibiting main branch work entirely, allow it with explicit
user consent. This is more flexible while still ensuring users are aware
of the implications.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
 2026-01-29 15:12:50 -08:00
CL Kao
b63d485955 docs(subagent-driven-development): add main branch red flag to Never list 
Add explicit warning against starting implementation on main/master
branch without first using a worktree for isolation.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
 2026-01-29 14:45:04 -08:00
CL Kao
fa3f46d4e9 docs(subagent-driven-development): add using-git-worktrees as required skill 
Adds using-git-worktrees as the first required workflow skill in the
Integration section. This makes explicit that an isolated workspace
should be set up before starting subagent-driven development.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
 2026-01-29 14:43:33 -08:00
Jesse Vincent
2a19be0b78 Document skill description trap: descriptions override flowcharts 
Testing revealed that skill descriptions summarizing workflow cause
Claude to follow the description instead of reading the skill body.

- A description saying "code review between tasks" caused ONE review
- The flowchart clearly showed TWO reviews (spec compliance + quality)
- Minimal description ("Use when...") correctly deferred to flowchart

Updated writing-skills with:
- "Description = When to Use, NOT What the Skill Does" section
- Cautionary tale about this actual failure
- Examples of good (triggers only) vs bad (workflow summary) descriptions

Updated subagent-driven-development:
- Removed workflow summary from description
- Now just: "Use when executing implementation plans..."

Updated test runner:
- Added --dangerously-skip-permissions for automated testing
 2025-12-17 16:44:52 -08:00
Jesse Vincent
ed06dcbe27 Fix skill description to match flowchart: two-stage review (spec then quality) 2025-12-17 16:44:52 -08:00
Jesse Vincent
a9b94ae5d7 Rewrite subagent-driven-development with executable flowcharts 
- Add graphviz/dot flowcharts as primary executable instructions
- Extract prompt templates to separate collateral files:
  - ./implementer-prompt.md
  - ./spec-reviewer-prompt.md
  - ./code-quality-reviewer-prompt.md
- Use qualified skill names (superpowers:skill-name)
- Make flowchart labels explicit and action-oriented
- Add "When to Use" decision flowchart
- Keep detailed prose as supporting content
 2025-12-17 16:44:51 -08:00
Jesse Vincent
466332f698 Emphasize spec compliance review must complete before code quality 
Made sequencing explicit:
- Spec compliance review loop must fully complete (✅) before code quality
- Added "Do NOT proceed to code quality review until spec compliance is ✅"
- Code Quality Review section starts with "Only run after spec compliance review is complete"
- Red Flags: Added "Start code quality review before spec compliance is ✅ (wrong order)"

This ensures we don't waste time reviewing code quality of the wrong
implementation. Verify they built the right thing first, then verify
they built it well.
 2025-12-17 16:44:49 -08:00
Jesse Vincent
87afde2390 Make spec compliance reviewer skeptical and verification-focused 
The spec compliance reviewer now:
- Does NOT trust implementer's report
- Is warned implementer finished suspiciously quickly
- MUST verify everything by reading actual code
- Compares implementation to requirements line by line
- Reports issues with file:line references

Key additions:
- "Do Not Trust the Report" section
- Explicit DO NOT / DO lists
- "Verify by reading code, not by trusting report"
- Changed "What Was Implemented" to "What Implementer Claims They Built"

This prevents rubber-stamping and ensures independent verification
of spec compliance against actual codebase.
 2025-12-17 16:44:49 -08:00
Jesse Vincent
2a6a40fe10 Improve subagent-driven-development workflow 
Key improvements based on feedback:

1. Read plan once, not per task
   - Extract all tasks in Step 1
   - Reference extracted tasks in Step 2
   - Eliminates redundant file reading

2. Enable questions during work
   - Not just before, but also while working
   - "It's always OK to ask questions"
   - Don't guess or make assumptions

3. Add self-review before reporting
   - Completeness: implemented everything?
   - Quality: best work, clear names?
   - Discipline: avoided overbuilding?
   - Testing: comprehensive, real behavior?
   - Catches issues before handoff

4. Add spec compliance review
   - Separate reviewer checks: built the right thing?
   - Flags missing requirements
   - Flags extra/unneeded work
   - Flags misunderstandings
   - Runs BEFORE code quality review

5. Make reviews loops, not one-shot
   - Reviewer finds issues
   - Implementer fixes
   - Reviewer reviews again
   - Repeat until approved
   - Applies to both spec and code quality

Two-stage review process:
- Stage 1: Spec compliance (right thing?)
- Stage 2: Code quality (built well?)

This enables subagents to do their best work with clear requirements,
opportunities to clarify, self-critique, and thorough review loops.
 2025-12-17 16:44:49 -08:00
Jesse Vincent
97ce1f8fe0 Update subagent-driven-development: controller provides full task text 
Changed workflow so controller provides complete task context directly
rather than making subagent read plan file.

Key changes:
- Controller reads plan and extracts full task text
- Controller provides scene-setting context (dependencies, architecture)
- Subagent receives complete information in prompt (no file reading)
- Subagent can ask clarifying questions before beginning work
- Controller handles questions/concerns before subagent proceeds

Benefits:
- No file reading overhead for subagent
- Controller curates exactly what context is needed
- Questions surfaced before work begins (not after)
- Subagent has complete information to do best work

This enables subagents to start with clarity rather than ambiguity.
 2025-12-17 16:44:49 -08:00
Jesse Vincent
e3d881b7b6 Release v3.2.1: Add code-reviewer agent to plugin 
Fixes #55

Added superpowers:code-reviewer agent to plugin's agents/ directory.
Previously, skills referenced a code-reviewer agent that users needed
to configure personally, causing failures for new users.

Changes:
- New: agents/code-reviewer.md - Agent definition with systematic review checklist
- Updated: skills/requesting-code-review/SKILL.md - Use superpowers:code-reviewer
- Updated: skills/subagent-driven-development/SKILL.md - Use superpowers:code-reviewer
- Version bump: 3.2.0 -> 3.2.1
- Added: .claude-plugin/marketplace.json for local development testing
 2025-10-20 10:19:24 -07:00
Jesse Vincent
79436abffa Update all superpowers skill references to use namespace prefix 
Skills are now namespaced as superpowers:<name> when referenced.
Updated all REQUIRED SUB-SKILL, RECOMMENDED SUB-SKILL, and
REQUIRED BACKGROUND references to use the superpowers: prefix.

Also added -design suffix to brainstorming skill's design document
filename to distinguish from implementation plan documents.

Files updated:
- brainstorming: Added -design suffix, updated skill references
- executing-plans: Updated finishing-a-development-branch reference
- subagent-driven-development: Updated finishing-a-development-branch reference
- systematic-debugging: Updated root-cause-tracing and test-driven-development references
- testing-skills-with-subagents: Updated test-driven-development reference
- writing-plans: Updated executing-plans and subagent-driven-development references
- writing-skills: Updated test-driven-development, systematic-debugging, and testing-skills-with-subagents references
 2025-10-18 10:38:54 -07:00
Jesse Vincent
141953a4be Improve skill cross-references for clarity and compliance 
Update all skill references to use explicit requirement markers:
- REQUIRED BACKGROUND: For prerequisite understanding
- REQUIRED SUB-SKILL: For mandatory workflow dependencies
- Complementary skills: For optional but helpful related skills

Changes:
- Remove old path format (skills/collaboration/X → X)
- Add explicit "REQUIRED" markers to make dependencies clear
- Update Integration sections with categorized skill relationships
- Fix non-existent skill references
- Update cross-reference documentation in writing-skills

This makes it immediately clear which skills MUST be used vs optional references,
helping Claude understand and comply with skill dependencies.
 2025-10-17 10:18:50 -07:00
Jesse Vincent
48410c7f19 Standardize skill frontmatter names to lowercase and kebab-case 
- Update all 20 skill frontmatter names to match their directory names in lowercase
- Fix defense-in-depth name (was Defense-in-Depth-Validation)
- Fix receiving-code-review name (was Code-Review-Reception)
- Update all skill announcements and cross-references to use lowercase names
- Update commands redirects to reference lowercase skill names

Ensures consistent naming: skill directory names, frontmatter names, and documentation
references all use lowercase kebab-case format (e.g., brainstorming, test-driven-development)
 2025-10-17 09:40:36 -07:00
Jesse Vincent
9c9547cc04 Now that skills are a first-class thing in Claude Code, restore them to the primary plugin 2025-10-16 07:19:00 -07:00