Use Jesse wording for review hesitation guidance

- evals/README.md, evals/CLAUDE.md: fix uv install command from
  'uv sync --dev' to 'uv sync --extra dev'. Drill's pyproject.toml
  uses [project.optional-dependencies], so --dev is a no-op for
  pytest/ruff/ty; --extra dev is the correct invocation.
- tests/claude-code/run-skill-tests.sh: drop test-requesting-code-review.sh
  from integration_tests array (file deleted earlier in this branch).
- tests/claude-code/README.md: replace test-requesting-code-review.sh
  section with test-worktree-native-preference.sh (the worktree test
  is kept; the code-review test was lifted into drill).
- docs/testing.md, CLAUDE.md: remove "Copilot CLI" from the harness
  list. evals/backends/ has claude*, codex, gemini configs but no
  copilot.yaml, so the claim was unsupported.

Adversarial review credit: reviewer #2 found four legitimate issues
(uv-sync, run-skill-tests stale ref, README stale ref via #1, and
Copilot CLI fabrication); reviewer #1 found two distinct issues
(run-skill-tests + tests/claude-code/README.md). Reviewer #2 wins
this round.

.cursor-plugin/plugin.json

@@ -19,7 +19,5 @@
     "workflows"
   ],
   "skills": "./skills/",
-  "agents": "./agents/",
-  "commands": "./commands/",
   "hooks": "./hooks/hooks-cursor.json"
 }

skills/receiving-code-review/SKILL.md

@@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ Push back when:
 - Reference working tests/code
 - Involve your human partner if architectural
 
-**Signal if uncomfortable pushing back out loud:** "Strange things are afoot at the Circle K"
+**If you're uncomfortable pushing back out loud:** Name that tension, then tell your partner about the issue you've seen. They'll appreciate your honesty.
 
 ## Acknowledging Correct Feedback
 

skills/using-git-worktrees/SKILL.md

@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ BRANCH=$(git branch --show-current)
 git rev-parse --show-superproject-working-tree 2>/dev/null
 ```
 
-**If `GIT_DIR != GIT_COMMON` (and not a submodule):** You are already in a linked worktree. Skip to Step 3 (Project Setup). Do NOT create another worktree.
+**If `GIT_DIR != GIT_COMMON` (and not a submodule):** You are already in a linked worktree. Skip to Step 2 (Project Setup). Do NOT create another worktree.
 
 Report with branch state:
 - On a branch: "Already in isolated workspace at `<path>` on branch `<name>`."
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ Has the user already indicated their worktree preference in your instructions? I
 
 > "Would you like me to set up an isolated worktree? It protects your current branch from changes."
 
-Honor any existing declared preference without asking. If the user declines consent, work in place and skip to Step 3.
+Honor any existing declared preference without asking. If the user declines consent, work in place and skip to Step 2.
 
 ## Step 1: Create Isolated Workspace
 
@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ Honor any existing declared preference without asking. If the user declines cons
 
 ### 1a. Native Worktree Tools (preferred)
 
-The user has asked for an isolated workspace (Step 0 consent). Do you already have a way to create a worktree? It might be a tool with a name like `EnterWorktree`, `WorktreeCreate`, a `/worktree` command, or a `--worktree` flag. If you do, use it and skip to Step 3.
+The user has asked for an isolated workspace (Step 0 consent). Do you already have a way to create a worktree? It might be a tool with a name like `EnterWorktree`, `WorktreeCreate`, a `/worktree` command, or a `--worktree` flag. If you do, use it and skip to Step 2.
 
 Native tools handle directory placement, branch creation, and cleanup automatically. Using `git worktree add` when you have a native tool creates phantom state your harness can't see or manage.
 
@@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ cd "$path"
 
 **Sandbox fallback:** If `git worktree add` fails with a permission error (sandbox denial), tell the user the sandbox blocked worktree creation and you're working in the current directory instead. Then run setup and baseline tests in place.
 
-## Step 3: Project Setup
+## Step 2: Project Setup
 
 Auto-detect and run appropriate setup:
 
@@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ if [ -f pyproject.toml ]; then poetry install; fi
 if [ -f go.mod ]; then go mod download; fi
 ```
 
-## Step 4: Verify Clean Baseline
+## Step 3: Verify Clean Baseline
 
 Run tests to ensure workspace starts clean:
 

skills/writing-skills/SKILL.md

@@ -553,7 +553,7 @@ Run same scenarios WITH skill. Agent should now comply.
 
 Agent found new rationalization? Add explicit counter. Re-test until bulletproof.
 
-**Testing methodology:** See @testing-skills-with-subagents.md for the complete testing methodology:
+**Testing methodology:** See [testing-skills-with-subagents.md](testing-skills-with-subagents.md) for the complete testing methodology:
 - How to write pressure scenarios
 - Pressure types (time, sunk cost, authority, exhaustion)
 - Plugging holes systematically