Two bugs caused the brainstorm server to self-terminate within 60s:
1. ownerAlive() treated EPERM (permission denied) as "process dead".
When the owner PID belongs to a different user (Tailscale SSH,
system daemons), process.kill(pid, 0) throws EPERM — but the
process IS alive. Fixed: return e.code === 'EPERM'.
2. On WSL, the grandparent PID resolves to a short-lived subprocess
that exits before the first 60s lifecycle check. The PID is
genuinely dead (ESRCH), so the EPERM fix alone doesn't help.
Fixed: validate the owner PID at server startup — if it's already
dead, it was a bad resolution, so disable monitoring and rely on
the 30-minute idle timeout.
This also removes the Windows/MSYS2-specific OWNER_PID="" carve-out
from start-server.sh, since the server now handles invalid PIDs
generically at startup regardless of platform.
Tested on Linux (magic-kingdom) via Tailscale SSH:
- Root-owned owner PID (EPERM): server survives ✓
- Dead owner PID at startup (WSL sim): monitoring disabled, survives ✓
- Valid owner that dies: server shuts down within 60s ✓
Fixes#879
ownerAlive() treated EPERM (permission denied) the same as ESRCH
(process not found), causing the server to self-terminate within 60s
whenever the owner process ran as a different user. This affected WSL
(owner is a Windows process), Tailscale SSH, and any cross-user
scenario.
The fix: `return e.code === 'EPERM'` — if we get permission denied,
the process is alive; we just can't signal it.
Tested on Linux via Tailscale SSH with a root-owned grandparent PID:
- Server survives past the 60s lifecycle check (EPERM = alive)
- Server still shuts down when owner genuinely dies (ESRCH = dead)
Fixes#879
The session directory now contains two peers: content/ (HTML served to
the browser) and state/ (events, server-info, pid, log). Previously
all files shared a single directory, making server state and user
interaction data accessible over the /files/ HTTP route.
Also fixes stale test assertion ("Waiting for Claude" → "Waiting for
the agent").
Reported-By: 吉田仁
Metadata files (.server-info, .events, .server.pid, .server.log,
.server-stopped) were stored in the same directory served over HTTP,
making them accessible via the /files/ route. They now live in a .meta/
subdirectory that is not web-accessible.
Also fixes a stale test assertion ("Waiting for Claude" → "Waiting for
the agent").
Reported-By: 吉田仁
The subagent review loop (dispatching a fresh agent to review plans/specs)
doubled execution time (~25 min overhead) without measurably improving plan
quality. Regression testing across 5 versions (v3.6.0 through v5.0.4) with
5 trials each showed identical plan sizes, task counts, and quality scores
regardless of whether the review loop ran.
Changes:
- writing-plans: Replace subagent Plan Review Loop with inline Self-Review
checklist (spec coverage, placeholder scan, type consistency)
- writing-plans: Add explicit "No Placeholders" section listing plan failures
(TBD, vague descriptions, undefined references, "similar to Task N")
- brainstorming: Replace subagent Spec Review Loop with inline Spec Self-Review
(placeholder scan, internal consistency, scope check, ambiguity check)
- Both skills now use "look at it with fresh eyes" framing
Testing: 5 trials with the new skill show self-review catches 3-5 real bugs
per run (spawn positions, API mismatches, seed bugs, grid indexing) in ~30s
instead of ~25 min. Remaining defects are comparable to the subagent approach.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
8 tasks covering: environment detection in using-git-worktrees,
Step 1.5 + cleanup guard in finishing-a-development-branch,
Integration line updates, codex-tools.md docs, automated tests,
and final verification.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Design for making using-git-worktrees, finishing-a-development-branch,
and subagent-driven-development skills work in the Codex App's sandboxed
worktree environment. Read-only environment detection via git-dir vs
git-common-dir comparison, ~48 lines across 4 files, zero breaking changes.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Blocking a user prevents them from interacting with repositories, such as opening or commenting on pull requests or issues. Learn more about blocking a user.
