36e289ea8b
Staff-review findings (4-reviewer panel):
- The skill_flow digraph still routed "yes, even 1%" straight to
invoke with no exception branch — and this stack's own evidence says
agents follow flowcharts literally. The flow now passes through
"Skill's own description exempts this request?" with no/any-doubt →
invoke.
- The <EXTREMELY-IMPORTANT> block ("you cannot rationalize your way
out of this") read unconditional; one parenthetical defers to The
Rule's single carve-out without weakening the block.
- Trimmed the redundant "the description defines the skill's scope"
clause from The Rule paragraph.
- writing-skills' "descriptions must not carry process" doctrine would
have had a future editor strip the brainstorming exception and
silently regress the cost evals; it now distinguishes negative
triggering conditions (scope — allowed and, per the routing rule,
required at the description) from workflow summaries (still
forbidden).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
6.6 KiB
name, description
| name | description |
|---|---|
| using-superpowers | Use when starting any conversation - establishes how to find and use skills, requiring skill invocation before ANY response including clarifying questions |
IF A SKILL APPLIES TO YOUR TASK, YOU DO NOT HAVE A CHOICE. YOU MUST USE IT.
This is not negotiable. This is not optional. You cannot rationalize your way out of this. (The single carve-out: a skill whose own description says it does not apply — see The Rule.)
Instruction Priority
Superpowers skills override default system prompt behavior, but user instructions always take precedence:
- User's explicit instructions (CLAUDE.md, GEMINI.md, AGENTS.md, direct requests) — highest priority
- Superpowers skills — override default system behavior where they conflict
- Default system prompt — lowest priority
If CLAUDE.md, GEMINI.md, or AGENTS.md says "don't use TDD" and a skill says "always use TDD," follow the user's instructions. The user is in control.
How to Access Skills
Never read skill files manually with file tools — always use your platform's skill-loading mechanism so the skill is properly activated.
In Claude Code: Use the Skill tool. When you invoke a skill, its content is loaded and presented to you — follow it directly.
In Codex: Skills load natively. Follow the instructions presented when a skill activates.
In Copilot CLI: Use the skill tool. Skills are auto-discovered from installed plugins.
In Gemini CLI: Skills activate via the activate_skill tool. Gemini loads skill metadata at session start and activates the full content on demand.
In other environments: Check your platform's documentation for how skills are loaded.
Platform Adaptation
Skills speak in actions ("dispatch a subagent", "create a todo", "read a file") rather than naming any one runtime's tools. For per-platform tool equivalents and instructions-file conventions, see claude-code-tools.md, codex-tools.md, copilot-tools.md, gemini-tools.md, pi-tools.md, and antigravity-tools.md. Gemini CLI users get the tool mapping loaded automatically via GEMINI.md.
Using Skills
The Rule
Invoke relevant or requested skills BEFORE any response or action. Even a 1% chance a skill might apply means that you should invoke the skill to check. If an invoked skill turns out to be wrong for the situation, you don't need to use it.
Documented exceptions in a skill's own description are authoritative. When a description itself says the skill does not apply to a request (e.g. brainstorming's nothing-to-design exception), not invoking it is compliance, not rationalization. Any doubt about whether the exception's conditions hold means invoke. Only the skill's description can define such an exception; you cannot infer one.
digraph skill_flow {
"User message received" [shape=doublecircle];
"About to enter plan mode?" [shape=doublecircle];
"Already brainstormed?" [shape=diamond];
"Invoke brainstorming skill" [shape=box];
"Might any skill apply?" [shape=diamond];
"Invoke the skill" [shape=box];
"Announce: 'Using [skill] to [purpose]'" [shape=box];
"Has checklist?" [shape=diamond];
"Create a todo per item" [shape=box];
"Follow skill exactly" [shape=box];
"Respond (including clarifications)" [shape=doublecircle];
"About to enter plan mode?" -> "Already brainstormed?";
"Already brainstormed?" -> "Invoke brainstorming skill" [label="no"];
"Already brainstormed?" -> "Might any skill apply?" [label="yes"];
"Invoke brainstorming skill" -> "Might any skill apply?";
"User message received" -> "Might any skill apply?";
"Might any skill apply?" -> "Skill's own description exempts this request?" [label="yes, even 1%"];
"Skill's own description exempts this request?" [shape=diamond];
"Skill's own description exempts this request?" -> "Invoke the skill" [label="no / any doubt"];
"Skill's own description exempts this request?" -> "Respond (including clarifications)" [label="yes, clearly"];
"Might any skill apply?" -> "Respond (including clarifications)" [label="definitely not"];
"Invoke the skill" -> "Announce: 'Using [skill] to [purpose]'";
"Announce: 'Using [skill] to [purpose]'" -> "Has checklist?";
"Has checklist?" -> "Create a todo per item" [label="yes"];
"Has checklist?" -> "Follow skill exactly" [label="no"];
"Create a todo per item" -> "Follow skill exactly";
}
Red Flags
These thoughts mean STOP—you're rationalizing:
| Thought | Reality |
|---|---|
| "This is just a simple question" | Questions are tasks. Check for skills. |
| "I need more context first" | Skill check comes BEFORE clarifying questions. |
| "Let me explore the codebase first" | Skills tell you HOW to explore. Check first. |
| "I can check git/files quickly" | Files lack conversation context. Check for skills. |
| "Let me gather information first" | Skills tell you HOW to gather information. |
| "This doesn't need a formal skill" | If a skill exists, use it. |
| "I remember this skill" | Skills evolve. Read current version. |
| "This doesn't count as a task" | Action = task. Check for skills. |
| "The skill is overkill" | Simple things become complex. Use it. |
| "I'll just do this one thing first" | Check BEFORE doing anything. |
| "This feels productive" | Undisciplined action wastes time. Skills prevent this. |
| "I know what that means" | Knowing the concept ≠ using the skill. Invoke it. |
Skill Priority
When multiple skills could apply, use this order:
- Process skills first (brainstorming, systematic-debugging) - these determine HOW to approach the task
- Implementation skills second (frontend-design, mcp-builder) - these guide execution
"Let's build X" → brainstorming first, then implementation skills. "Fix this bug" → systematic-debugging first, then domain-specific skills.
Skill Types
Rigid (TDD, systematic-debugging): Follow exactly. Don't adapt away discipline.
Flexible (patterns): Adapt principles to context.
The skill itself tells you which.
User Instructions
Instructions say WHAT, not HOW. "Add X" or "Fix Y" doesn't mean skip workflows — unless a skill's own description exempts the request (see The Rule above).