Misc platform/runtime statements and adjacencies that don't fit the prose, config-ref, README-ordering, or tool-vocabulary buckets: - visual-companion frame template: rename CSS/HTML id #claude-content → #frame-content. The id is purely styling — nothing external references it. The brainstorm-server test that asserted the old string is updated in lockstep. - visual-companion launch instructions: add a Copilot CLI section alongside Claude Code, Codex, and Gemini CLI; combine the Claude Code (macOS / Linux) and (Windows) sections so heading style matches the other (non-OS-qualified) platforms. - visual-companion: "Use Write tool" → "Use your file-creation tool" for the cat/heredoc warning. The prohibition is what's load- bearing, not the tool name. - executing-plans/SKILL.md: list all subagent-capable runtimes (Claude Code, Codex CLI, Codex App, Copilot CLI, Gemini CLI) and point at the per-platform tool refs as the source of truth. - executing-plans/SKILL.md: relative path "using-superpowers/ references/" → "../using-superpowers/references/" to resolve correctly from the executing-plans/ directory. No bundled spec doc here — Phase D was scope-extension work that took place across rounds, with no standalone spec authored.
2.5 KiB
name, description
| name | description |
|---|---|
| executing-plans | Use when you have a written implementation plan to execute in a separate session with review checkpoints |
Executing Plans
Overview
Load plan, review critically, execute all tasks, report when complete.
Announce at start: "I'm using the executing-plans skill to implement this plan."
Note: Tell your human partner that Superpowers works much better with access to subagents. The quality of its work will be significantly higher if run on a platform with subagent support (Claude Code, Codex CLI, Codex App, Copilot CLI, and Gemini CLI all qualify; see the per-platform tool refs in ../using-superpowers/references/). If subagents are available, use superpowers:subagent-driven-development instead of this skill.
The Process
Step 1: Load and Review Plan
- Read plan file
- Review critically - identify any questions or concerns about the plan
- If concerns: Raise them with your human partner before starting
- If no concerns: Create todos for the plan items and proceed
Step 2: Execute Tasks
For each task:
- Mark as in_progress
- Follow each step exactly (plan has bite-sized steps)
- Run verifications as specified
- Mark as completed
Step 3: Complete Development
After all tasks complete and verified:
- Announce: "I'm using the finishing-a-development-branch skill to complete this work."
- REQUIRED SUB-SKILL: Use superpowers:finishing-a-development-branch
- Follow that skill to verify tests, present options, execute choice
When to Stop and Ask for Help
STOP executing immediately when:
- Hit a blocker (missing dependency, test fails, instruction unclear)
- Plan has critical gaps preventing starting
- You don't understand an instruction
- Verification fails repeatedly
Ask for clarification rather than guessing.
When to Revisit Earlier Steps
Return to Review (Step 1) when:
- Partner updates the plan based on your feedback
- Fundamental approach needs rethinking
Don't force through blockers - stop and ask.
Remember
- Review plan critically first
- Follow plan steps exactly
- Don't skip verifications
- Reference skills when plan says to
- Stop when blocked, don't guess
- Never start implementation on main/master branch without explicit user consent
Integration
Required workflow skills:
- superpowers:using-git-worktrees - Ensures isolated workspace (creates one or verifies existing)
- superpowers:writing-plans - Creates the plan this skill executes
- superpowers:finishing-a-development-branch - Complete development after all tasks