The skill previously required an explicit reply to its "do you want a
worktree?" dialogue, which produced obtuse UX when the user invoked the
skill by name — agents had to stop and ask "do you want a worktree?"
even though the user just asked for the skill whose purpose is worktrees.
Loosen Step 2 to recognize the invoking turn as consent: if the user's
most recent message named the skill, asked for a worktree, or asked for
an isolated workspace, proceed directly to Step 3 without re-prompting.
The gate still fires for the transitive case (agent infers isolation
from a feature description) — that remains the #991 failure mode.
Also trim "or skill invocation" from the anti-inference Red Flag and
destale the Integration section now that SDD/executing-plans no longer
require a worktree.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Post-inversion cleanup:
- executing-plans, subagent-driven-development: update Integration
description from "Ensures isolated workspace" to "Detects workspace
environment and offers worktree isolation on request"
- codex-tools.md: update step references (Step 0→1, Step 1→2)
- using-git-worktrees Step 2: restore "silence → ask once more" instead
of "silence → work in place" to preserve safety net for confused users
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Agents consistently skipped Step 0.5 (consent gate) because fractional
numbering signals "optional afterthought" and the prose-only step was
invisible to code-block anchoring. The fix inverts the structural
gravity: the default path now works in place, and worktree creation
is an off-ramp requiring explicit user request.
- Renumber to clean integers: Step 1 (detect) → 2 (offer) → 3 (create) → 4 (setup) → 5 (verify)
- Step 2 defaults to Step 4 (in-place); Step 3 only on explicit user ask
- Step 2 includes a code block so agents register it during execution
- Add "creating without being asked" to Common Mistakes
- Add anti-inference red flag: consent from task/plan/skill invocation doesn't count
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Drill benchmark showed 0/4 consent compliance across both Claude Code
and Codex. Root cause: consent was buried inline in Step 0's conditional
branch. Agents anchor on the next bash command and skip prose.
Fix: promote consent to its own numbered section with imperative framing
("REQUIRED STOP", "Do NOT proceed without an answer") and exact output
template. Also adds explicit "no" path — users who want to work directly
on their current branch skip to Step 3 with no worktree creation.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Addresses review feedback on #1123. Replaces "(same Step 0→1a→1b flow,
matching branch names)" with plain-language instruction that doesn't
forward-reference section numbers that could rot under future edits.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Jesse flagged that the verbose CLAUDE.md/AGENTS.md/GEMINI.md/.cursorrules
enumeration (a) chews tokens, (b) confuses models that anchor on exact
strings, and (c) is repeated DRY-violatingly across 3+ locations.
Replace with abstract "your instructions" framing in four spots:
- skills/using-git-worktrees/SKILL.md Step 0 → Step 1 transition
- skills/using-git-worktrees/SKILL.md Step 1b Directory Selection
- docs/superpowers/plans/2026-04-06-worktree-rototill.md (both mirror locations)
Same intent, harness-agnostic phrasing, ~half the tokens.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Address obra's comment on explicit step numbers / prescriptive tone.
Drops "STOP HERE if available", the "If YES:" gate, and the "even if /
even if / NO EXCEPTIONS" reinforcement paragraph. Keeps the specific
tool-name anchors (EnterWorktree, WorktreeCreate, /worktree, --worktree),
which the original TDD data showed are load-bearing.
A/B verified against drill harness on the 3 creation/consent scenarios
(consent-flow, creation-from-main, creation-from-main-spec-aware):
baseline explicit wording scored 12/12 criteria, softened wording also
scored 12/12. The "agent used the most appropriate tool" criterion
passed in all 3 softened runs — agents still picked EnterWorktree via
ToolSearch without the imperative framing.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
- Consent prompt: drop "(y/n)" and add escape valve for users who
have already declared their worktree preference in global or
project agent instruction files.
- Directory selection: reorder to put declared user preference
ahead of observed filesystem state, and reframe the default as
"if no other guidance available".
- Sandbox fallback: require explicitly informing the user that
the sandbox blocked creation, not just "report accordingly".
- writing-plans: fully qualify the superpowers:using-git-worktrees
reference.
- Plan doc: mirror the consent-prompt change.
Step 1a native-tool framing and the helper-scripts suggestion are
still outstanding — the first needs a benchmark re-run before softer
phrasing can be adopted without regressing compliance; the second is
exploratory and will get a thread reply.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Git worktrees inherit hooks from the main repo automatically via
$GIT_COMMON_DIR — this has been the case since git 2.5 (2015).
The symlink step was based on an incorrect premise from PR #965
and also fails in practice (.git is a file in worktrees, not a dir).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Tested on Gemini CLI (gemini -p) and Cursor Agent (cursor-agent -p):
- Gemini: Step 0 detection 1/1, Step 1b fallback 1/1
- Cursor: Step 0 detection 1/1, Step 1b fallback 1/1
Both correctly identified no native agent-callable worktree tool,
fell through to git worktree add, and performed safety verification.
Both correctly detected existing worktrees and skipped creation.
5 of 6 harnesses now tested. Only OpenCode untested (no CLI access).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Research confirmed Claude Code is currently the only harness with an
agent-callable mid-session worktree tool. All others either create
worktrees before the agent starts (Codex App, Gemini, Cursor) or have
no native support (Codex CLI, OpenCode).
Table now shows: what was actually tested (Claude Code 50/50, Codex CLI
6/6), what was simulated (Codex App 1/1), and what's untested (Gemini,
Cursor, OpenCode). Step 1a is forward-compatible for when other
harnesses add agent-callable tools.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Step 1a's original "deliberately short, abstract" design was disproven
by TDD (2/6 pass rate). Spec now documents the validated approach:
explicit tool naming + consent bridge + red flag (50/50 pass rate).
- Design Principles: updated to reflect explicit naming over abstraction
- Step 1a: replaced abstract text with validated approach, added design
note explaining the TDD revision and why file splitting was unnecessary
- Risks: Step 1a risk marked RESOLVED with cross-platform validation table
and residual risk note about upstream tool description dependency
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Step 1a failed at 2/6 with the spec's original abstract text ("use your
native tool"). Three REFACTOR iterations found what works (50/50 runs):
1. Explicit tool naming — "do you have EnterWorktree, WorktreeCreate..."
transforms interpretation into factual toolkit check
2. Consent bridge — "user's consent is your authorization" directly
addresses EnterWorktree's "ONLY when user explicitly asks" guardrail
3. Red Flag entry naming the specific anti-pattern
File split was tested but proven unnecessary — the fix is the Step 1a
text quality, not physical separation of git commands. Control test
with full 240-line skill (all git commands visible) passed 20/20.
Test script updated: supports batch runs (./test.sh green 20), "all"
phase, and checks absence of git worktree add (reliable signal) rather
than presence of EnterWorktree text (agent sometimes omits tool name).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
The creation skill supports both .worktrees/ and worktrees/ directories,
but the finishing skill's cleanup only checked .worktrees/. Worktrees
under the non-hidden path would be orphaned on merge or discard.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Remove REQUIRED language from executing-plans and subagent-driven-development.
Consent and detection now live inside using-git-worktrees itself.
Fix stale 'created by brainstorming' claim in writing-plans.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
using-git-worktrees: submodule guard now says "treat as normal repo"
instead of "proceed to Step 1" (preserves consent flow)
using-git-worktrees: directory priority summaries include global legacy
finishing-a-development-branch: move git branch -d after Step 6 cleanup
to make Bug #999 ordering unambiguous (merge -> worktree remove -> branch delete)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Step 2: environment detection (GIT_DIR != GIT_COMMON) before presenting menu
Detached HEAD: reduced 3-option menu (no merge from detached HEAD)
Provenance-based cleanup: .worktrees/ = ours, anything else = hands off
Bug #940: Option 2 no longer cleans up worktree
Bug #999: merge -> verify -> remove worktree -> delete branch
Bug #238: cd to main repo root before git worktree remove
Stale worktree pruning after removal (git worktree prune)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Gate test for Step 1a — validates agents prefer EnterWorktree over
git worktree add on Claude Code. Must pass before skill rewrite.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
5 tasks: TDD gate for Step 1a, using-git-worktrees rewrite,
finishing-a-development-branch rewrite, integration updates,
end-to-end validation. Task 1 is a hard gate — if native tool
preference fails RED/GREEN, stop and redesign.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
- Step 1a is the load-bearing assumption, not just a risk — if it fails,
the entire design needs rework. TDD validation must be first impl task.
- #1009 resolution depends on Step 1a working, stated explicitly
- #574 honestly deferred, not "partially addressed"
- Add hooks symlink to Step 1b (PR #965 idea, prevents silent hook loss)
- Add stale worktree pruning to Step 5 (PR #1072 idea, one-line self-heal)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
- Fix Bug #999 order: merge → verify → remove worktree → delete branch
(avoids losing work if merge fails after worktree removal)
- Add submodule guard to Step 0 detection (GIT_DIR != GIT_COMMON is also
true in submodules)
- Preserve global path (~/.config/superpowers/worktrees/) in detection for
backward compatibility, just stop offering it to new users
- Add step numbering note and implementation notes section
- Expand provenance heuristic to cover global path and manual creation
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Design for detect-and-defer worktree support. Superpowers defers to
native harness worktree systems when available, falls back to manual
git worktree creation when not. Covers Phases 0-2: detection, consent,
native tool preference, finishing state detection, and three bug fixes
(#940, #999, #238).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Move bootstrap injection from experimental.chat.system.transform to
experimental.chat.messages.transform, prepending to the first user
message instead of adding a system message.
This avoids two issues:
- System messages repeated every turn inflate token usage (#750)
- Multiple system messages break Qwen and other models (#894)
Tested on OpenCode 1.3.2 with Claude Sonnet 4.5 — brainstorming skill
fires correctly on "Let's make a React to do list" prompt.
The bootstrap text advertised a configDir-based skills path that didn't
match the runtime path (resolved relative to the plugin file). Tests
used yet another hardcoded path and referenced a nonexistent lib/ dir.
- Remove misleading skills path from bootstrap text; the agent should
use the native skill tool, not read files by path
- Fix test setup to create a consistent layout matching the plugin's
../../skills resolution
- Export SUPERPOWERS_SKILLS_DIR from setup.sh so tests use a single
source of truth
- Add regression test that bootstrap doesn't advertise the old path
- Remove broken cp of nonexistent lib/ directory
Fixes#847
Copilot CLI v1.0.11 reads `additionalContext` from sessionStart hook
output, but the session-start script only emits the Claude Code-specific
nested format. Add COPILOT_CLI env var detection so Copilot CLI gets the
SDK-standard top-level `additionalContext` while Claude Code continues
getting `hookSpecificOutput`.
Based on PR #910 by @culinablaz.
Two bugs caused the brainstorm server to self-terminate within 60s:
1. ownerAlive() treated EPERM (permission denied) as "process dead".
When the owner PID belongs to a different user (Tailscale SSH,
system daemons), process.kill(pid, 0) throws EPERM — but the
process IS alive. Fixed: return e.code === 'EPERM'.
2. On WSL, the grandparent PID resolves to a short-lived subprocess
that exits before the first 60s lifecycle check. The PID is
genuinely dead (ESRCH), so the EPERM fix alone doesn't help.
Fixed: validate the owner PID at server startup — if it's already
dead, it was a bad resolution, so disable monitoring and rely on
the 30-minute idle timeout.
This also removes the Windows/MSYS2-specific OWNER_PID="" carve-out
from start-server.sh, since the server now handles invalid PIDs
generically at startup regardless of platform.
Tested on Linux (magic-kingdom) via Tailscale SSH:
- Root-owned owner PID (EPERM): server survives ✓
- Dead owner PID at startup (WSL sim): monitoring disabled, survives ✓
- Valid owner that dies: server shuts down within 60s ✓
Fixes#879
ownerAlive() treated EPERM (permission denied) the same as ESRCH
(process not found), causing the server to self-terminate within 60s
whenever the owner process ran as a different user. This affected WSL
(owner is a Windows process), Tailscale SSH, and any cross-user
scenario.
The fix: `return e.code === 'EPERM'` — if we get permission denied,
the process is alive; we just can't signal it.
Tested on Linux via Tailscale SSH with a root-owned grandparent PID:
- Server survives past the 60s lifecycle check (EPERM = alive)
- Server still shuts down when owner genuinely dies (ESRCH = dead)
Fixes#879
The session directory now contains two peers: content/ (HTML served to
the browser) and state/ (events, server-info, pid, log). Previously
all files shared a single directory, making server state and user
interaction data accessible over the /files/ HTTP route.
Also fixes stale test assertion ("Waiting for Claude" → "Waiting for
the agent").
Reported-By: 吉田仁
Metadata files (.server-info, .events, .server.pid, .server.log,
.server-stopped) were stored in the same directory served over HTTP,
making them accessible via the /files/ route. They now live in a .meta/
subdirectory that is not web-accessible.
Also fixes a stale test assertion ("Waiting for Claude" → "Waiting for
the agent").
Reported-By: 吉田仁
The subagent review loop (dispatching a fresh agent to review plans/specs)
doubled execution time (~25 min overhead) without measurably improving plan
quality. Regression testing across 5 versions (v3.6.0 through v5.0.4) with
5 trials each showed identical plan sizes, task counts, and quality scores
regardless of whether the review loop ran.
Changes:
- writing-plans: Replace subagent Plan Review Loop with inline Self-Review
checklist (spec coverage, placeholder scan, type consistency)
- writing-plans: Add explicit "No Placeholders" section listing plan failures
(TBD, vague descriptions, undefined references, "similar to Task N")
- brainstorming: Replace subagent Spec Review Loop with inline Spec Self-Review
(placeholder scan, internal consistency, scope check, ambiguity check)
- Both skills now use "look at it with fresh eyes" framing
Testing: 5 trials with the new skill show self-review catches 3-5 real bugs
per run (spawn positions, API mismatches, seed bugs, grid indexing) in ~30s
instead of ~25 min. Remaining defects are comparable to the subagent approach.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
8 tasks covering: environment detection in using-git-worktrees,
Step 1.5 + cleanup guard in finishing-a-development-branch,
Integration line updates, codex-tools.md docs, automated tests,
and final verification.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
